On August 18 2020 at 5pm UK time/12 noon EST, the Digital Freedom Platform by London Real is proud to be exclusively livestreaming what might be the most important documentary you will ever see: PLANDEMIC – INDOCTORNATION.
Created by the team behind the game-changing Plandemic video segment from Mikki Willis featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits that went viral and was banned on every major social media platform for exposing the truth about Covid-19, this new FEATURE LENGTH PIECE promises to be the most revelatory film on what is driving the vaccine agenda, the various roles of the WHO, Bill Gates, Tedros Adhanom, Anthony Fauci and more.
Going deep into what is really happening with mainstream media, Silicon Valley tech giants, big pharma and our health protection agencies, Mikki’s new film finally connects the dots…
… And we are excited to be able to share this with you…
We believe that this film will fundamentally shift the discourse around Coronavirus, the lockdown and the vested interests involved; register now for updates and to watch the movie today.
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WSFA) – We all know it’s very warm to simply miserably hot and humid for what seems like at least 6 months a year here in Alabama. Unfortunately, that is the perfect recipe for ticks, tick-related illnesses and poisonous plant growth.
But the number of ticks and poisonous plants has and will likely continue to rise across the state as our seasons continue to get warmer and more humid. Not only that, but the danger factor associated with both ticks and poisonous plants is also rising. That is according to scientists at Climate Central, an independent organization of scientists and journalists researching and reporting on the changing climate and its impact on the public. (See link for article)
Three of the most common tick-related diseases in Alabama are Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, ehrlichiosis and Lyme disease. According to data from UAB, total cases in Alabama for each of them have jumped rather significantly. For example, during that 8-year span Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever cases increased by a staggering 500%.
Our ‚authorities‘ are only too happy to get side-tracked with climate data rather than come clean on their involvement. Dr. Fauci, the king on the NIAID throne since 1984 (interesting year, huh?), decides who gets government funding for research. Through his position he can control the narrative and in the case of Lyme/MSIDS, he wants to continue to pigeon-hole it into an easily defined illness they can create lucrative tests, drugs, and vaccines for. This is what they do.They own medicine and science and are completely in bed with Big Pharma. If you defy this accepted narrative, they will hunt you down and make your life miserable. Many Lyme doctors have gone through this trial by fire.
In essence, Walker like most on the group seriously think we believe we are ill, and if we would believe differently we would no longer be ill.
Please go into the link and contact Congressman Pallone and express that until a public hearing is held on the way Lyme has been handled (the gory back-story in full) we do not want another dime of tax-payer money going to HHS. They need to know we are tired of their games getting us no where on our nickel. They need to cease and desist until the truth is aired and doctors, researchers, and patients outside The Cabal are heard. Also, contact your own representative and educate them on this so they are better equipped to make decisions.
SUBACUTE TRANSVERSE MYELITIS CAUSED BY BORRELIA INFECTION
Lyme neuroborreliosis can manifest as encephalitis or acute/subacute transverse myelitis. Only a handful of subacute transverse myelitis cases have been reported in the literature. In their article, “Subacute transverse myelitis with optic symptoms in neuroborreliosis: a case report,” Opielka et al. describe one of the few cases of subacute transverse myelitis (SaTM) associated with Lyme neuroborreliosis and involving the optic nerve.By Dr. Daniel Cameron
Subacute transverse myelitis is a neurologic syndrome caused by inflammation of the spinal cord. It can be caused by various infections, including Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacteria causing Lyme disease. Immune system disorders, vascular and other inflammatory disorders can also trigger the condition which damages or destroys myelin, an insulating substance that surrounds nerves, including those in the brain and spinal cord. ¹
It’s estimated that “transverse myelitis with infectious or parainfectious etiology accounts for 12%” of all cases, writes Opielka. Borrelia burgdorferi is one of the infectious agents known to trigger the disease. But in 40% of the cases, the cause is unknown.
Typical symptoms associated with transverse myelitis include bilateral or unilateral limb weakness, sensory disturbances, and disruption of the autonomic system.Approximately 1 in 3 patients with transverse myelitis report having a febrile illness around the onset of neurologic symptoms.
“The clinical presentation of our patient was diagnostically challenging,” the authors write.
“The only indicator of a possible tick bite was an episode of raised temperature, followed by symptoms of neck stiffness and pain reported by the patient.” Furthermore, a long period of time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and hospitalization.
Tests indicate elevated intracranial pressure
Tests revealed the patient had bilateral papilloedema (optic disc swelling caused by increased intracranial pressure) and bilateral diffuse thickening of the retinal fiber nerve layer in all quadrants.
“Blurred optic margins and several flame-like peripapillary hemorrhages were observed in both eyes,” as well, writes Opielka.
Based on nerve conduction study findings, “radiculopathy of nerve roots of both peroneal nerves and the right median nerve was diagnosed. Furthermore, sensory neuropathy of both sural nerves and the right median nerve was also detected,” the authors write.
Routine blood tests were normal, but Western blot tests for Lyme disease were positive.
MRI results indicated the patient had “longitudinally extensive (> 3 segments) enlargement of the spinal cord mostly visible from C3 to C6/C7 level.”
Images also showed a hyperintense, spindle-like lesion in the central part of the spinal cord.
“An MRI of the optic nerve disclosed bilateral protrusion of the optic nerve heads, slight vertical tortuosity of both optic nerves, and bilateral hyperintense perioptic nerve sheath,” the authors explain.
“Together these signs could indicate elevated intracranial pressure,” writes Opielka.
As you have seen from many of my recent posts our ‚authorities‘ like Dr. Fauci push the idea of ‚Big Science‘ which is large, placebo controlled double-blind studies. Lyme/MSIDS has extremely few of those, but we do have many, many case studies. These are not taken seriously by mainstream medicine but the information is out there for us to learn from. When MSM finally accepts that this complex illness looks differently on everyone, perhaps they will begin accepting these smaller studies.
When I read this I couldn’t help thinking that few things cause spine stiffness, pain, and swelling but these symptoms are hallmark for Lyme disease. I remember being barely able to twist my back to reverse my car. The pain was excruciating. Same with my neck which bothers me to this day and may never go back to normal. Tremors, burning and prickling sensations are also hallmark symptoms.
The interesting thing about the cervical region,where the woman had extreme pain as well as nausea and vertigo, is that the vertebrae there differ from those in the rest of the spine in that each has openings to transport blood to the brain. C1, also called the Atlas vertebra, supports the weight of the head. Personally, I’ve had a lot of body work done in this area due to ongoing pain and stiffness.
Chiropractors who specialize and have a lot of extra training in this area are called Upper Cervical Chiropractors and are connected with NUCCA: https://nucca.org It is quite different from standard chiropractic and involves no popping, twisting, or cracking. I also have trouble with my hips and by adjusting the atlas bone, my body self-adjusts all the way down eliminating my hip pain as well. My entire family has benefitted from this treatment for different issues. If you struggle with your neck and spine you should consider this treatment.
In reference to the following statement from the „Tick bite“ paper:
“…most tick bites are harmless and do not transmit Lyme disease. Apart from in high risk areas, most ticks (=85%) are not infected. In Europe, including the UK, between 5% and 40% of ticks may be infected.1 Only 2-3% of people with a tick bite develop Lyme disease.”
This is like playing Russian roulette with one’s health…. five of the chambers in a six shooter do not contain a projectile (83%). So no big deal… everyone should play the game!
Patient testimony all across the United States and (the globe) is describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers while leaving its victim in financial ruin. 
Is this publication a continuation of a racketeering scheme to downplay the severity of Lyme disease? 
Patients who miss the narrow window of opportunity for successful short-term treatment (due to a false negative serologic test, missing bulls-eye rash, misdiagnosis, etc. etc.) advance to late stage debilitating neurologic Lyme and are left to fend for themselves and are often told that they need a psychiatric evaluation.
Question: What was the motivation for this paper on tick-borne Lyme disease?
93,000 signatures from across America and twenty additional countries. Please open that PDF and read the comments. 2. Rapid Response: The BMJ Re: Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1 _______________________________________________________ Follow-up letter to the Editor-in-Chief of the BMJ ———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE email@example.com To: „firstname.lastname@example.org“ email@example.com Cc: (coauthors of the “tick bite” paper) Date: 08/15/2020 9:20 AM Subject: Inquiry to Dr. Godlee
Dear Dr. Godlee,
The fixation on the acute stage of Lyme disease with bulls-eye rash and early treatment has long been established here in America. Avoidance of the horribly disabled Lyme patient population and suppression of persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment is the established modus operandi of the academics who have controlled the Lyme disease narrative for the past thirty years. As mentioned in my previous letter to the editor, ( published on June 10, 2020) these academics are now defendants in a racketeering lawsuit in Texas District Court.
Focusing on the acute stage of disease gives the illusion that Lyme is a simple nuisance disease but it is well known that strep throat left untreated progresses to rheumatic fever causing irreversible heart damage.
So, what happens to the Lyme patient who goes months, years or decades without treatment because of a “false negative serologic test, missing bulls-eye rash, misdiagnosis, etc. etc”?
The consequences of untreated Lyme disease are not emphasized in the Razai paper but Lyme left untreated can lead to horrible disability.
1. A 1993 hearing in Washington was chaired by Senator Ted Kennedy where fourteen-year-old Lyme patient Evan White testified while in a wheelchair. NEWS: Former patient who testified as a child about Lyme disease recalls encounter with Sen. Ted Kennedy https://www.lymedisease.org/186/
“No one could hear or feel the moment of that child and not be moved,” Kennedy explained to the [Boston] Globe at the time. Anyone who wasn’t moved, he said, “hasn’t got a heart.”
Based on the summary below it appears that it took years of antibiotics, not weeks to treat Evan’s disability. Had he not met Dr. Joseph Burrascano, Evan would have been a burden on the Social Security program today through „therapeutic nihilism.“ 
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — A 12-year-old girl who has been confined to a wheelchair since being diagnosed with Lyme disease said meeting Pope Francis as he arrived in New York Thursday was “the most precious moment of my life.”
Specific DNA sequences of Borrelia burgdorferi were identified in cutaneous lesions from 9 patients (follicle center lymphoma: 3/20; immunocytoma: 3/4; marginal zone B-cell lymphoma: 2/20; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: 1/6).
I didn’t find any of these references in the Razai paper or references of persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment which as you know were omitted from the Kullberg paper.
So who are the peer reviewers of these two papers and what is the connection if any to the defendants of the racketeering lawsuit?
Hudson, NH USA
1. The twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism in clinical practice Sílvia Mamede , Henk G Schmidt DOI: 10.1111/medu.12264
Please note the polar opposite way ‚authorities‘ handle Lyme/MSIDS vs COVID. It’s clearly known that the elderly population with co-morbidities are mostly at risk for COVID with a similar mortality rate as seasonal flu, yet the world is stopped, faces are covered, and the media is whipped up into a frenzy spreading daily fear porn.
Lyme/MSIDS which is growing exponentially everywhere,many are not getting well after standard treatment, and it’s becoming more widely known that Lyme is just the tip of the spear, with ticks transmitting much more than just Lyme. Yet, funding for Lyme/MSIDS research is abysmal, nothing has changed in over 40 years, and the world is still waiting to hear the outcome of a racketeering lawsuit as well as an inquiry into our own government experimenting and dropping ticks out of airplanes. Doctors are still woefully uneducated and hide behind ancient CDC dogma that hasn’t changed, despite new evidence. The same corrupt players are doing the same biased research on our dime.
It’s crystal clear that there is much more at play than meets the eye because if you are going to use statistics, at least use the same logic, yet we are told 85% of ticks aren’t infected and not to worry (despite the fact ticks are being found in areas they shouldn’t be, full of pathogens they shouldn’t have) yet it’s known that 81% of us can mount a strong response to COVID-19 without ever having been exposed to it before. It’s also known that 80% of people with COVID are mildly ill. We also know that up to 80% are asymptomatic – meaning they have ZERO symptoms.
The question begging to be asked is why are these 80% figures being treated completely differently. With ticks we are told, „Don’t worry, be happy,“ yet when it comes to COVID, we are told „cover your face, don’t leave your house, shutter your business, keep kids home from school, and wash your hands repeatedly,“ ad nauseum.
Something doesn’t smell right. Time to speak up about this disparity.
Bill Gates warns you will probably need multiple doses of any given COVID-19 vaccine for it to be effective
The Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (currently known only as mRNA-1273), caused systemic side effects in 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose
Side effects ranged from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%). After the second dose, 100% of participants in the 100-mcg group experienced side effects
In the 250-mcg dose group, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses. Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events”
According to Gates, the side effects are largely due to the high dosages Moderna had to use to achieve the desired antibody levels. But if high dosages are required to create a robust-enough immune response, and higher dosages also cause systemic side effects in most or all people, the safety of the global vaccination campaign may be questionable
As vaccine companies rush to bring a COVID-19 vaccine to market, billionaire Microsoft founder Bill Gates — who routinely funnels hundreds of millions of dollars to various vaccine projects — warns you will probably need “multiple doses” of any given COVID-19 vaccine for it to be effective.1
In speaking with CBS News, Gates said, “None of the vaccines at this point appear like they’ll work with a single dose,” adding that in order to wipe the virus out through universal vaccinations it will require “unbelievably big numbers” of doses. To be effective, he also predicts we will need to vaccinate around 80% of the global population so, yes, we’re talking about tens of billions of doses.
100% of Moderna Vaccine Participants Suffered Side Effects
Gates visibly struggles to maneuver through the pointed questions posed by CBS about the safety of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (currently known only as mRNA-1273), which was recently found2 to cause systemic side effects in 80% of Phase 1 participants receiving the 100 microgram (mcg) dose.
Side effects ranged from fatigue (80%), chills (80%), headache (60%) and myalgia or muscle pain (53%). After the second dose, 100% of participants in the 100-mcg group experienced side effects.
In the highest dosage group, which received 250 mcg, 100% of participants suffered side effects after both the first and second doses.3 Three of the 14 participants (21%) in the 250-mcg group suffered “one or more severe events.”
Despite these worrisome results, the trial is being heralded as a big success, and vaccine expert Dr. Paul Offit has been quoted4 as saying we now know “that it’s safe in 45 people,” and that “it doesn’t have a very common side effect problem.”
Clearly, we have very different perceptions of reality on what “very common” means. If 80% to 100% is considered uncommon, then just what level of harm must be inflicted in order for a vaccine to be viewed as having a questionable safety profile?
According to Gates, those side effects are largely due to the high dosages Moderna had to use in order to achieve the desired antibody levels. But, if high dosages are required to create a robust-enough immune response, and higher dosages also cause systemic side effects in a vast majority of people, just how safe will this global vaccination campaign be?
Keep in mind, the 45 participants in Moderna’s Phase 1 trial were healthy individuals between the ages of 18 and 55.5 Meanwhile, over 90% of Americans are metabolically unhealthy and struggle with chronic health conditions that can make them more prone to vaccine complications.
What’s more, frail elderly are unlikely to survive serious vaccine side effects, yet people over 80 are the most vulnerable to COVID-19 and would theoretically stand to benefit from the vaccine most.
Coronavirus Vaccines Have Been Notoriously Prone to Failure
High risk of side effects is probably to be expected, considering a) the history of coronavirus vaccines in general, b) most of the COVID-19 vaccines under development are relying on mRNA technology that have never been used in vaccine production before now, and c) the vaccines are being fast-tracked, forgoing animal studies.
Starting with the first issue, researchers have been unable to produce a coronavirus vaccine despite decades-long efforts. While SARS-CoV-2 is a novel human coronavirus, there are seven others that cause respiratory illness in humans, including four that trigger the common cold,6 which is why vaccine makers have been trying to develop coronavirus vaccines in the past.Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus.
Among the coronaviruses that cause respiratory illness are SARS and MERS. Coronavirus vaccine efforts gained speed in early 2002, following three SARS epidemics.
However, such efforts have proven highly problematic as coronavirus vaccines have a stubborn tendency to trigger paradoxical immune responses, and researchers have not been able to find a solution for that. This alone is why fast-tracking a COVID-19 vaccine is a terribly risky decision. As reported by Reuters, March 11, 2020:7
“Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus.
The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine.
Normally, researchers would take months to test for the possibility of vaccine enhancement in animals. Given the urgency to stem the spread of the new coronavirus, some drugmakers are moving straight into small-scale human tests, without waiting for the completion of such animal tests.
‘I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,’ Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters.”
Why a Vaccine May Trigger More Severe Illness
In my interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who chairs the board of directors of the Children’s Health Defense,8 he reviewed some of the failed efforts to produce a viable coronavirus vaccine, starting in 2002, and highlighted the dangers of vaccine exaggeration of the immune response:
“The Chinese, the Americans, the Europeans all got together and said, ‘We need to develop a vaccine against coronavirus.’ Around 2012, they had about 30 vaccines that looked promising. They took the four best of those and … gave those vaccines to ferrets, which are the closest analogy when you’re looking at lung infections in human beings.
The ferrets had an extraordinarily good antibody response, and that is the metric by which FDA licenses vaccines … The ferrets developed very strong antibodies, so they thought, ‘We hit the jackpot.’ All four of these vaccines … worked like a charm.
Then something terrible happened. Those ferrets were then exposed to the wild virus, and they all died. [They developed] inflammation in all their organs, their lungs stopped functioning and they died.
Then those scientists remembered that the same thing had happened in the 1960s when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine, which is an upper respiratory illness very similar to coronavirus.
At the time, they did not test it on animals. They went right to human testing. They tested it on about 35 children, and the same thing happened. The children developed a champion antibody response, robust, durable. It looked perfect, and then the children were exposed to the wild virus and they all became sick. Two of them died. They abandoned the vaccine. It was a big embarrassment to FDA and NIH.”
As it turns out, they eventually discovered that there are two kinds of antibodies being produced by the coronavirus. When you read press releases and studies about COVID-19 vaccines, you’ll see them referring to:
Neutralizing antibodies9 that fight the infection, and
Binding antibodies10 (also known as nonneutralizing antibodies) that do not prevent viral infection
The binding antibodies, rather than fighting the infection, actually trigger what’s known as paradoxical immune enhancement. As explained above, what this means is that even though you may have a robust antibody response, when you’re exposed to the actual virus, rather than protecting you it actually enhances the virus’ ability to make you sick or even kill you.
Looking at the preliminary findings11 from Moderna’s mRNA-1273 Phase 1 trial, we see that neutralizing antibody responses were quite good, “reducing SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by 80% or more” at day 43. However, we also see that:
“Binding antibody IgG geometric mean titers (GMTs) to S-2P increased rapidly after the first vaccination, with seroconversion in all participants by day 15. Dose-dependent responses to the first and second vaccinations were evident.”
Does this rapid increase in binding antibodies mean paradoxical immune enhancement is a possibility? One of my main concerns with COVID-19 vaccines is, will they actually conduct testing to see if paradoxical immune enhancement occurs?Meaning, will they expose vaccinated participants to SARS-CoV-2, to see what happens?
mRNA Vaccines May Produce Serious Side Effects
Aside from the possibility of a paradoxical immune response, mRNA vaccines may in and of themselves be problematic. Inside your cells, mRNA activate DNA instructions, and act as a template to build a specific protein.
The theory behind mRNA vaccines is that when you inject the mRNA, it will stimulate your own cells to manufacture the virus proteins.12 In this case, those proteins would mimic the proteins found in SARS-CoV-2.
Conventional vaccines train your body to recognize and respond to the proteins of a particular virus by injecting a small amount of the actual viral protein into your body, thereby triggering an immune response and the development of antibodies.
mRNA vaccines are designed to make your body produce its own viral protein, which your immune system would then mount a response to. No previous vaccines have had your own cells produce the viral proteins responsible for producing immunity.
What might go wrong when you turn your body into a viral protein factory, thus activating antibody production on a continual basis? Well, since there are no mRNA vaccines on the market, it’s hard to tell. But, according to researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and Duke University:13,14
“mRNA vaccines have potential safety issues, including local and systemic inflammation and stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and autoimmunity, as well as development of edema (swelling) and blood clots.”
Some of these effects, such as systemic inflammation and blood clots, resemble severe symptoms of COVID-19 itself. So, does that mean mRNA vaccines might worsen COVID-19 infection? What’s more, since the mRNA vaccines work on the genetic level and could become integrated into your DNA, might they cause long-term, perhaps even generational, problems?
Some COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Not Using Inert Placebos
Some COVID-19 vaccine trials also appear to be structured in such a way as to hide side effects, which does not inspire trust. As noted in a July 21, 2020, Wired article,15 some trials are using injected meningococcal vaccine rather than a true placebo, and anytime you use another vaccine as a control, certain symptoms of harm are automatically obscured.
Another way to hide side effects is to administer the vaccine along with certain drugs. One example of this is the University of Oxford’s COVID-19 vaccine trial, which has one study arm in which subjects are given acetaminophen every six hours for the first 24 hours after inoculation.
Is the pain and fever reducer given to mask and downplay certain symptoms and side effects, such as pain, fever, headache or general malaise? It might. As noted by Wired:16
“The press release for … results from the Oxford vaccine trials described an increased frequency of ‘minor side effects’ among participants. A look at the actual paper, though, reveals this to be a marketing spin …
Yes, mild reactions were far more common than worse ones. But moderate or severe harms — defined as being bad enough to interfere with daily life or needing medical care — were common too.
Around one-third of people vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine without acetaminophen experienced moderate or severe chills, fatigue, headache, malaise, and/or feverishness.
Close to 10 percent had a fever of at least 100.4 degrees, and just over one-fourth developed moderate or severe muscle aches. That’s a lot, in a young and healthy group of people — and the acetaminophen didn’t help much for most of those problems.”
While he claims there’s separation between these two, it’s a flimsy one at best, and clearly illegal. While the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation doles out grants, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust is a separate entity that manages the Foundation’s assets.
However, these two entities have glaringly obvious overlapping interests, and grants given by the foundation frequently benefit the value of the trust’s assets directly. I wrote about this illegal setup in “Bill Gates — Most Dangerous Philanthropist in Modern History?” This is why, despite giving away billions of dollars, Gates’ “Decade of Vaccines” has doubled his worth, from $54 billion to $103.1 billion.
Since President Trump stopped the U.S. funding of the WHO, Gates is now the largest funder of the World Health Organization, which is laying down the ground rules that all nations are expected to follow, which, of course, includes the recommendation to vaccinate, as soon as a vaccine becomes available.
Gates’ remarkable rise to influence on global health matters is founded not on expertise but on money. Just like John D. Rockefeller before him, Gates gained public adoration by donating money to ostensibly “humanitarian causes” — and purchasing good publicity.
Nowadays, he needs all the good publicity he can buy. As more people are getting wise to his greedy get-rich vaccine schemes, his reputation is rapidly tarnishing.
According to an April 23, 2020, Newspunch article,17 410,000 people had signed a White House petition18 to investigate the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for crimes against humanity and medical malpractice. At the time of this writing, the petition has garnered 628,668 signatures. That’s well over six times the number required to illicit an official response. The petition is still open if you’d like to add your signature.
Some of the outstanding questions about DNA vaccine safety include:23
chronic inflammationbecause the vaccine continually stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies
possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome resulting in mutations
problems with DNA replication
triggering of autoimmune responses, and
activation of cancer-causing genes
Various groups have uncovered that numerous COVID-19 vaccines have aborted fetal cell lines (PER C6 Ad5 technology) which not only has moral implications for many but safety concerns according to the FDA:
Also, please remember these same authorities don’t want Lyme/patients to have access to long-term therapy.They say it’s dangerous. Yet, when it comes to an experimental, DNA vaccine causing many side effects, they are silent, yet determinedly move straight ahead. Just another example of how the two diseases are handled very differently.
Regierungszahlen zur „Integrationsbilanz“ darf man getrost misstrauen. Denn sie beziehen sich zum einen nur auf den offiziell gemeldeten Teil der in Deutschland lebenden Menschen fremder Herkunft. Wie viele es insgesamt sind und wovon nicht erfasste Zuwanderer ihren Lebensunterhalt bestreiten, kann man nur erahnen. Zum Beispiel, wenn man in Berlin auf der Suche nach dem nächsten Joint durch den Görlitzer Park schlendert. Aber so genau weiß es eben niemand. Und so genau will es offenbar auch kaum jemand wissen.
Den Angaben zufolge sind nach einem halben Jahrzehnt nur 31 Prozent aller in Deutschland lebenden Menschen aus Afghanistan, Eritrea, dem Irak, dem Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia und Syrien sozialversicherungspflichtig beschäftigt. Innerhalb dieser Gruppe verdienen sechs Prozent so wenig, dass sie mit dem Einkommen ihren Lebensunterhalt nicht bestreiten können. Insgesamt hat „gut die Hälfte“ dieser 31 Prozent, die irgendetwas arbeiten, einen sogenannten „Helferjob“, wie die „Welt“ schreibt. Viele davon hat die öffentliche Hand geschaffen, sie sind also unrentabel.
Das heisst: Nach einem halben Jahrzehnt gehen offiziell weniger als 15 Prozent der seit 2015 bei uns lebenden Menschen aus Afghanistan, Eritrea, den Irak, den Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia und Syrien einer normalen Arbeit nach, von der sie leben können und die nicht staatlich subventioniert wird. Die bei weitem meisten Asylbewerber von 2015, die sich derzeit offiziell in Deutschland aufhalten, leben nach wie vor auf Kosten des deutschen Steuerzahlers.
Trotzdem meint Felicitas Schikora vom Deutschen Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung: „Das ist durchaus ein Erfolg.“ – Da sei die Frage erlaubt: Wenn das ein Erfolg ist, wie sähe dann ein Misserfolg aus?Plug&Browse WIFI Repeater
Bereits im April wurde eine Spaziergängerin in Tauberbischofsheim von zwei Südländern vergewaltigt. Mit der Veröffentlichung eines Phantombildes vier Monate nach der Tat hoffen Staatsanwaltschaft und Polizei nun auf durchschlagenden Fahndungserfolg.
Die Kulturanreicherung aus allen archaischen Regionen der Welt ist in vollem Gange, mittlerweile auch in baden-württembergischen Naturschutzgebieten: Nach der heimtückischen Vergewaltigung einer Frau sucht nun die Polizei in Tauberbischofsheim (Main-Tauber-Kreis) nach zwei Triebtätern, die bereits im April – vor vier Monaten – eine Spaziergängerin gemeinsam vergewaltigten. Die Fahndung nach den Merkelgästen läuft wohl schneller als die Polizei und der grünschwarze Amtsschimmel in Baden-Württemberg erlaubt.
Die Frau war bereits am 23. April zwischen 19.30 Uhr und 20.30 Uhr im Naturschutzgebiet Brachenleite unterwegs, als die beiden Männer die Spaziergängerin ansprachen. Die beiden Genital-Goldstücke hatten offensichtlich neben ihrem Auto auf Sie gewartet. Die Männer überwältigten die Frau und vergingen sich an ihr, berichtet die Polizei. Als ein Auto in der Nähe vorbeifuhr, ließen die Täter nach erfolgter Vergewaltigung von der Frau ab und flüchteten.
Zeugen haben in der Nähe des Tatorts bei Grünsfeld auf dem halben Weg in Richtung Autobahnrasthof „Ob der Tauber“ zwei Männer beobachtet, wie die Ermittler nun diesen Mittwoch mitteilten. Von einem habe ein Phantombild angefertigt werden können. Die Männer werden so beschrieben:
„Zwischen 30 und 40 Jahre alt, südländisches Aussehen, zwischen 160 und 170cm groß, sie sprachen gebrochenes Deutsch“.
Das Phantombild kann zudem auf der Fahndungsseite der Polizei Baden-Württemberg angesehen werden. Hinweise zur Identität der abgebildeten Person nimmt das Kriminalkommissariat Tauberbischofsheim unter der Telefonnummer 09341-810 entgegen.
Die Mainstreammedien berichten „neutral“ und machen sich so weiterhin zu Helfershelfern der illegal importierten Täter, zum Beispiel titelt die linke Bertelsmann-Nachrichtenseite RTL.de:
„Vergewaltigung in Tauberbischofsheim: Polizei sucht Mann
Nach der Vergewaltigung einer Frau sucht die Polizei in Tauberbischofsheim (Main-Tauber-Kreis) nach einem Unbekannten. Zeugen haben in der Nähe des Tatorts zwei Männer beobachtet, wie die Ermittler am Mittwoch mitteilten. Von einem habe ein Phantombild angefertigt werden können. Ob der Gesuchte ein Verdächtiger oder ein Zeuge ist, steht laut Polizei derzeit noch noch nicht fest. Zwei Männer hatten die Spaziergängerin im April in einem Naturschutzgebiet angesprochen, überwältigt und vergewaltigt. Als ein Auto an ihnen vorbeifuhr, ließen die Täter von ihr ab und flüchteten.“
Die intelligenteren Leser von „rtl.de“ können aber inzwischen zwischen den Zeilen lesen.