Whistleblower Reveals Many Pregnancy Complications following Experimental COVID Injections – “Vaccine Leaving a Trail of Devastated Mothers”
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
When the Pfizer experimental COVID “vaccines” were given emergency use authorization (EUA) in the U.S. in December, 2020, Health Impact News reported that while the U.K.’s EUA for the Pfizer shot had warnings for pregnant women, nursing women, and women planning on becoming pregnant, to NOT get the shot, the U.S. FDA’s guidelines for the same Pfizer shot failed to include any such warnings. See: Unlike UK, U.S. FDA Allows Pregnant and Nursing Women to Receive Experimental Pfizer COVID Vaccine
We also reported previously of at least one case where a pregnant doctor received the experimental COVID shots, and then reported that she had a miscarriage three days later. See: Wisconsin Resident Doctor has Miscarriage 3 Days After Being Injected with Experimental COVID mRNA Shot
According to a pro-life group out of New Mexico, a whistleblower who sits on a COVID-19 task force is claiming that many pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, miscarriage, and spontaneous abortions following COVID vaccines are being concealed from the public.
Bud Shaver from Abortion Free New Mexico reports:
Last month, Abortion Free New Mexico released a report on a woman from Michigan, who at 28 weeks of pregnancy, received the first dose of Pfizer’s BioNTech vaccine. She later delivered a nonviable 29-week old baby. Her baby had no heartbeat within three days of the vaccine and she reported the stillbirth directly to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website attributing the vaccine to her baby’s death.
Abortion Free New Mexico continues to receive information from a whistleblower, who sits on a COVID 19 task force, who is concerned not only about these adverse reactions in pregnant women but also about how the media is not alerting the public to these reactions that are resulting in stillbirths at an alarming rate.
According to our whistleblower:
We’re up to 35 adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, miscarriage, spontaneous abortion) related to the ‘vaccine’ and 25 ‘birth defects’. There have been 925 deaths reported overall with about 300 of them within 2 days of getting the shot. These are just short term effects!
There are also reports of ‘permanent disability’. There will be more later and by then it will be difficult to link them to the vaccine.
This is VERY VERY bad and so many people have already been vaccinated. Many will develop severe autoimmune diseases like MS, infertility, & prion diseases, thrombocytopenia, alzheimers, nonspecific brain damage, lung immunopathology, multiple organ failure.
I guess most of the doctors don’t understand the science. I can’t believe more aren’t fighting this. It’s against the Nuremberg code and a horrible crime against humanity. Since the embryo/fetus is so quickly developing they’re a good indicator of toxicity.
The other scientists on my team seem ‘afraid’ to say anything and everything we put out is filtered through the politicians before THEY decide what gets told to the public.
Tara Shaver, spokeswoman for Abortion Free New Mexico issued the following statement:
Pregnant women are being mislead to believe that the Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy.
However, our whistleblower who is currently working on a COVID 19 task-force is very concerned about the large amount of adverse short term effects already being reported, especially in pregnant women.
In addition, it is disturbing that OBGYN doctors are advising pregnant women to take the vaccines.
In one instance, two doctors in Virginia made this recommendation and within two days a woman miscarried her baby.
This vaccine is leaving a trail of devastated mothers and who knows what the long term fertility issues may be for these women.
The COVID 19 vaccines being administered to pregnant women must be halted immediately.
These vaccines should not be promoted by the medical community as safe because the evidence is mounting that they, in fact, are not. (Source.)
The Epoch Times has also just published an article documenting some of these cases that have been reported to the VAERS database regarding pregnant women who have taken the experimental COVID shots.
In one case, a physician in Tennessee, at five weeks pregnant, suffered a miscarriage 13 days after being immunized with a Pfizer vaccine. The 31-year-old woman had no known allergies or medical history.
While a 33-year-old Indiana nurse in her third week of pregnancy had a miscarriage five days after receiving her second Pfizer vaccine. She also reported that the adverse event caused a birth defect.
And a 32-year-old woman in Virginia who was eight weeks pregnant reported having a miscarriage five days after being injected with the first dose of a Moderna vaccine in January. She had consulted with two obstetrics and gynecologists (OB-GYN) prior to receiving the vaccine on Jan. 14. She experienced abdominal cramping and vaginal bleeding two days later and had a miscarriage on Jan. 19. She had only been taking prenatal vitamins.
In Michigan, a 35-year-old woman who was 28 weeks and five days pregnant said that the baby’s movements decreased two days after her first Pfizer vaccine in December 2020. The woman delivered a stillborn baby weighing two pounds and seven ounces at 29 weeks. She was being closely monitored for an umbilical cord abnormality called velamentous cord insertion.
Both Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
In addition, the FDA did not reply to The Epoch Times’ inquiry on whether the regulatory agency will be looking into the VAERS report. An FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that their subject matter experts working with vaccines are “quite busy” at the moment.
Dr. Shelley Cole, MD, an OB-GYN and a member of America’s Frontline Doctors, says it’s concerning that a vaccine still in an experimental phase is being recommended to pregnant and lactating women and that science is no longer protecting them.
“As an obstetrician-gynecologist, it is a concern,” Cole told The Epoch Times. “We’re [now] throwing science and the scientific medicine method out the window and jeopardizing pregnancies and future pregnancies.”
“It concerns me that the CDC says that there are no studies, but it’s okay to get it and you don’t even need to discuss it with your doctor,” Cole added. “I mean this is the opposite of everything that the scientific models and methods, and standard of care has been for a century.”
In its guidance on “Vaccination Considerations for People who are Pregnant or Breastfeeding,” the CDC says that pregnant or lactating women who are “part of a group recommended to receive COVID-19 vaccine, such as healthcare personnel, may choose to be vaccinated” and that they are not required to discuss with their doctor “prior to vaccination” even though there is limited evidence “available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines” in this group.
There is also no safety data on the “effects of mRNA vaccines on the breastfed infant or on milk production/excretion,” yet the vaccine is “not thought to be a risk to the breastfeeding infant.” (Source.)
The Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) is having their quarterly meeting tomorrow, March 4, 2021, and the CDC will be issuing a report on “Maternal vaccination safety summary” for the new COVID vaccines that have been granted emergency use authorization.
Health Impact News has obtained a copy, which should be posted on the hrsa.gov website by tomorrow, and this is what the CDC is reporting:
Maternal vaccination safety summary
Pregnant women were not specifically included in pre-authorization clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines
– Post-authorization safety monitoring and research are the primary ways to obtain safety data on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy
Larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women have registered in v-safe
The reactogenicity profile and adverse events observed among pregnant women in v-safe did not indicate any safety problems
Most reports to VAERS among pregnant women (73%) involved non-pregnancyspecific adverse events (e.g., local and systemic reactions)
Miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event to VAERS; numbers are within the known background rates based on presumed COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to pregnant women
So even though there are “larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women” reporting adverse reactions to the experimental vaccines, and even though “miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event,” the CDC concludes that this “did not indicate any safety problems.”
Do You Trust the CDC?
As we have reported numerous times here at Health Impact News, the CDC is a corrupt organization that cannot be trusted. They are the largest purchaser and distributor of vaccines in the world, allocating over $5 BILLION in their budget (supplied by American taxpayers) each year to purchase and distribute vaccines from Big Pharma. See: Should the CDC Oversee Vaccine Safety When They Purchase Over $5 Billion of Vaccines from Big Pharma?
The CDC also owns over 56 patents on vaccines, and many of their scientists earn royalties from the sale of vaccines. (Source.)
The CDC has a long history of corruption, and over the years many of their own scientists have tried to blow the whistle on this corruption only to be silenced. See some of our previous coverage on CDC corruption:
- Can We Trust the CDC? British Medical Journal Reveals CDC Lies About Ties to Big Pharma
- CDC Scientist Whisteblowers Confirm Corruption Within the CDC
- CDC Whistleblower: CDC Covered Up MMR Vaccine Link to Autism in African American Boys
- The CDC’s History of Research Fraud Regarding Vaccines and Autism
In addition, many of the directors running the CDC go on to work for Big Pharma developing vaccines after they complete their term at the CDC. See: Former CDC Director that Approved Gardasil Vaccine and Became Head of Merck’s Vaccine Division Named “Woman of the Year”
But they do have some interesting tips on “Preparedness,” if you are interested (thanks to a Health Impact News reader who alerted me to this section of the CDC website). (Zombie Preparedness)
March 5, 2021
My testimony before a Wisconsin legislative hearing seeking to bar mandated COVID vaccines
‘Besides mandatory vaccination being severely damaging, and stupid … (it) would also happen to be a grave abuse against the rights of persons, and thus a serious violation of the moral law as well.’Fri Mar 5, 2021
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.
MADISON, Wisconsin, March 5, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — On Wednesday, the Wisconsin State Assembly’s Committee on Constitution and Ethics hosted a hearing on bills aimed at countering the growing trend of de facto-mandated COVID-19 vaccinations (story here).
The 8 1/2-hour hearing hosted a steady overwhelming stream of representatives from organizations, and many citizens, who all expressed their support for bills that would affirm that neither local health officials nor employers can require these injections of residents or employees, respectively.
With the Wisconsin state Senate having already passed the bills, passage in the Assembly would send them to the desk of Democrat Gov. Tony Evers, whose position on the bills is not yet clear. Both legislative chambers have a Republican majority.
As a citizen of Wisconsin, I was privileged to present my thoughts as well. The testimony I provided is below.
Testimony in favor of Assembly Bills 23, 24, and 25
Thank you, Chairman Wichgers, and members of the committee.
I’m Patrick Delaney, a local resident from Madison. I grew up here and have worked as an activist, a teacher, an administrator, and now as a journalist for LifeSiteNews.
I’m speaking in favor of Assembly bills 23, 24, and 25, though I will limit my remarks to the vaccine mandate bills, AB 23 and 25.
I would also echo what other commenters have said in supporting amendments that would apply these bills generally to all vaccines and all epidemics, not just those associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus. (See link for article)
- AB23 prohibits state and local health officers from “requiring individuals to receive a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, which causes COVID-19.”
- AB25 prohibits “an employer from requiring an individual to receive a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus or show evidence of having received such a vaccine.”
I agree that this protection should also include ANY ‘vaccines’ in ANY ‘epidemic’ as this attempt to usurp your rights will not end with the COVID saga.
This issue is not hypothetical as Wisconsinites have already been fired for not getting the jab.
Almost half of all states are introducing legislation that protects the right to refuse and RightToRefuse.org will act as a central location to list any state group actively working at their state legislature that is putting forward bills to protect the fundamental right to make choices about health care without fear of coercion.
The website will provide:
- Clickable State Map — Find groups in your state working to pass Right to Refuse legislation
- State Page for Each State including: state Groups working to introduce and pass legislation, active Bills protecting the right to make one’s own medical decisions, state Action Alerts being initiated by state groups
- Resources, Tools, Education & Trainings — Training on how to lobby legislators, fact sheets, model legislation. No need to reinvent the wheel in every state.
March 8, 2021